Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 163
Filtrar
1.
Am J Med Sci ; 367(6): 363-374, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417573

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 have been reported to experience adverse cardiovascular outcomes, such as myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Among these complications, heart failure (HF) has emerged as the most common critical complication during exacerbations of COVID-19, potentially leading to increased mortality rates and poorer clinical outcomes. We aimed to investigate the in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19 patients with HF. METHODS: We analyzed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset to select COVID-19 patients aged over 18 years who were hospitalized between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, using ICD-10. Based on the presence of acute HF, the patients were divided into two cohorts. The clinical outcomes and complications were assessed at index admissions using STATA v.17." RESULTS: 1,666,960 COVID-19 patients were hospitalized in 2020, of which 156,755 (9.4%) had associated HF. COVID-19 patients with HF had a mean age of (72.38 ± 13.50) years compared to (62.3 ± 17.67) years for patients without HF. The HF patients had a higher prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, smoking, and preexisting cardiovascular disease. Additionally, after adjusting for baseline demographics and comorbidities, COVID-19 patients with HF had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (23.86% vs. 17.63%, p<0.001), acute MI (18.83% vs. 10.91%, p<0.001), acute stroke (0.78% vs. 0.58%, p=0.004), cardiogenic shock (2.56% vs. 0.69%, p<0.001), and sudden cardiac arrest (5.54% vs. 3.41%, p<0.001) compared to those without HF. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients admitted with acute HF had worse clinical outcomes, such as higher mortality, myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and a higher length of stay and healthcare than patients without HF.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/complicaciones , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto
2.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(1 Pt A): 101913, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37557942

RESUMEN

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is accepted as an alternative to surgery, but data on combined percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and TAVI during the same in-hospital stay are still lacking. Using the national inpatient sample (NIS) database, we identified all TAVI encounters and compared in-hospital outcomes of patients who had TAVI only to patients who had TAVI and PCI. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR). Of 291,810 patient encounters with TAVI, 13,114 (4.5%) had combined PCI during the same index admission. The average age was 79.61 ± 8.61 years in the TAVI-only vs 80.25 ± 8.73 years in the combined TAVI-PCI group. Combined TAVI and PCI was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (4.5% vs 1.8%, aOR: 2.3), stroke (4.7% vs 2.9%, aOR: 1.4), net adverse events (NAE) (20.2% vs 5.7%, aOR: 3.6), major bleeding (40.1% vs 24.3%, aOR: 1.8), vascular complications (10.6% vs 2.5%, aOR: 3.9), acute kidney injury (AKI) (23.3% vs 11.7%, aOR: 2.1), hemodialysis (HD) (4.2% vs 2.4%, aOR: 1.4), postoperative cardiogenic shock (1.2% vs 0.4%, aOR: 2.8), need for mechanical circulatory support (6.9% vs 1%, aOR: 7); p-value < 0.001 for all. The utilization of permanent pacemakers was similar between the groups (9.8% vs 9.2%, aOR: 1; p = 0.6). Combining TAVI and PCI during the same index admission is associated with worse outcomes. The decision to do PCI for patients undergoing TAVI should be individualized and tailored based on the patient's clinical conditions.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Pacientes Internos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Hospitales , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Am J Cardiol ; 207: 206-214, 2023 11 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751668

RESUMEN

Limited data comparing prasugrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome are available. Online databases, including MEDLINE and Cochrane Central, were queried to compare these drugs. The primary outcomes of this meta-analysis are myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, noncardiovascular mortality, stent thrombosis, and stroke. The secondary outcome is major bleeding. A total of 9 studies, including 94,590 patients (prasugrel group = 32,759; ticagrelor group = 61,831), were included in this meta-analysis. The overall mean age was 62.73 years, whereas the mean age for the ticagrelor and prasugrel groups was 63.80 and 61.65 years, respectively. Prasugrel is equally effective as compared with ticagrelor in preventing MI. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding all-cause mortality, stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, prasugrel is equally effective when compared with ticagrelor in preventing MI.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Trombosis , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico
4.
Am J Cardiol ; 205: 396-402, 2023 10 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37659259

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is often observed in severe aortic stenosis, which can be attributed to the presence of arteriovenous malformations and von Willebrand's factor deficiency. GI is one of the most common complications in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The outcome of the TAVI procedure with GI bleeding is unknown. We performed an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision-based national cohort analysis using the national readmission database from 2016 to 2020. We compared cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, and readmission rates of patients with TAVI who developed GI bleeding compared with those who had no GI bleeding. A total of 320,353 hospitalizations with TAVI were identified from the year 2016 to 2020. Patients with TAVI with GI bleeding were 6,193.37 and without GI bleeding were 314,160. The median age of the patients with TAVI with GI or without GI bleeding was 80. GI bleed patients had statistically significantly higher readmission rates at 30, 90, and 180 days and they had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.37 to 7.52; p <0.0001), acute kidney injury (aOR = 5.22; 95% CI:4.75 to 5.74; p <0.0001), stroke (aOR = 2.83; 95% CI 2.05 to 3.91 p:0.0001, postprocedural bleeding (aOR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.30; p:0.0001), cardiac tamponade (aOR = 2.54; 95% CI 1.86 to 3.49; p <0.0001), use of mechanical circulatory support (aOR: 5.33; 95% CI:4.13 to 6.86; p <0.0001), and heart failure (aOR:1.73; 95%CI: 1.54 to 1.94; p <0.0001). The total cost of hospitalization and length of stay was higher in the GI bleed group. Patients with TAVI with GI bleeding have worse clinical outcomes and higher in-hospital mortality and readmission rates compared with patients with no GI bleeding.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Taponamiento Cardíaco , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Bases de Datos Factuales
5.
Cureus ; 15(7): e42227, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37605686

RESUMEN

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is a medical emergency that encompasses an array of signs and symptoms due to obstruction of blood flow through the superior vena cava (SVC). It poses a significant healthcare burden due to its associated morbidity and mortality. Its impact on the healthcare system continues to grow due to the increasing incidence of the condition. This incidence trend has been attributed to the growing use of catheters, pacemakers, and defibrillators, although it is a rare complication of these devices. The most common cause of SVCS remains malignancies accounting for up to 60% of the cases. Understanding the pathophysiology of SVCS requires understanding the anatomy, the SVC drains blood from the right and left brachiocephalic veins, which drain the head and the upper extremities accounting for about one-third of the venous blood to the heart. The most common presenting symptoms of SVCS are swelling of the face and hand, chest pain, respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, stridor, cough, hoarseness, and dysphagia), and neurologic manifestations (headaches, confusion, or visual/auditory disturbances). Symptoms generally worsen in a supine position. Diagnosis typically requires imaging, and SVCS can be graded based on classification schemas depending on the severity of symptoms and the location, understanding, and degree of obstruction. Over the past decades, the management modalities of SVCS have evolved to meet the increasing burden of the condition. Here, we present an umbrella review providing an overall assessment of the available information on SVCS, including the various management options, their indications, and a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of these modalities.

6.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 30(3): 941-954, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37204688

RESUMEN

In 2022, the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology® published many excellent original research articles and editorials focusing on imaging in patients with cardiovascular disease. In this review of 2022, we summarize a selection of articles to provide a concise recap of major advancements in the field. In the first part of this 2-part series, we addressed publications pertaining to single-photon emission computed tomography. In this second part, we focus on positron emission tomography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance. We specifically review advances in imaging of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, cardio-oncology, infectious disease cardiac manifestations, atrial fibrillation, detection and prognostication of atherosclerosis, and technical improvements in the field. We hope that this review will be useful to readers as a reminder to articles they have seen during the year as well as ones they have missed.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Sistema Cardiovascular , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica , Humanos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica/métodos
8.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 30(2): 452-478, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36797458

RESUMEN

In this review, we will summarize a selection of articles on single-photon emission computed tomography published in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2022. The aim of this review is to concisely recap major advancements in the field to provide the reader a glimpse of the research published in the journal over the last year. This review will place emphasis on myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography summarizing advances in the field including in prognosis, non-perfusion variables, attenuation compensation, machine learning and camera design. It will also review nuclear imaging advances in amyloidosis, left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony, cardiac innervation, and lung perfusion. We encourage interested readers to go back to the original articles, and editorials, for a comprehensive read as necessary but hope that this yearly review will be helpful in reminding readers of articles they have seen and attracting their attentions to ones they have missed.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Sistema Cardiovascular , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/métodos , Corazón , Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica/métodos , Pulmón
9.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 23(1): 65, 2023 02 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36737711

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many hemodynamic parameters provide limited information regarding obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) during exercise stress testing particularly when exercise is suboptimal. Hemodynamic gain index (HGI) is a recent sensitive indicator of ischemia and has been associated with increased mortality. This study evaluated the clinical impact of HGI in patients who underwent concomitant exercise stress testing and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS: A total of 284 consecutive patients from the executive health program between 2010 and 2018 were identified. Resting and peak heart rate (HR) as well as systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurements were recorded. Framingham risk score (FRS), Duke treadmill score (DTS) and HGI [Formula: see text] were calculated. The latter was divided into quartiles. CCTA was used as a reference test to detect any CAD. Multivariate analysis and artificial neural network were used to determine the independent predictors of obstructive CAD. RESULTS: Mean age was 53 ± 12 years with 83% male. Mean HGI was 1.74 ± 0.67, with cut-off value of severely blunted HGI ≤ 1.25 (Quartile 4). Patients with severely blunted HGI were older, had higher FRS, and worse DTS. Patients with obstructive CAD had lower HGI when compared to those with normal CCTA/non-obstructive CAD (1.36 ± 0.53 vs. 1.77 ± 0.67, P = 0.005), and showed a higher prevalence of severely blunted HGI (44% vs. 22%, P = 0.019). After adjusting for traditional risk factors, HGI remained an independent predictor of obstructive CAD while severely blunted HGI was associated with threefold increased odds of having obstructive CAD (P = 0.05). Using artificial intelligence analysis, severely blunted HGI independently predicted obstructive CAD with an area under the curve of 0.83 and 0.96, and normalized importance of HGI of 100% and 63%, respectively for different models. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who underwent concomitant exercise stress testing and CCTA, severely blunted HGI independently predicted obstructive CAD after multivariate adjustment for traditional risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Relevancia Clínica , Inteligencia Artificial , Hemodinámica , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
11.
Case Rep Cardiol ; 2023: 8326020, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36713823

RESUMEN

Leadless pacing systems have revolutionized the field of electrophysiology given its low complication rates and almost non-existent rate of infections compared with traditional pacemakers. These devices boast resistance to infections given its unique features; however, as described in this report, device-related infection from these leadless devices is still possible. In patients with leadless pacing system that is persistently bacteremic in the future, evaluation of the device with transesophageal echocardiogram or intracardiac echocardiography should be performed, and if vegetation is noted on the device, device extraction should highly be considered, along with empiric intravenous antibiotics. Lastly, new leadless device should not be re-implanted within 2 weeks of the removal of the infected device to prevent seeding of the new device.

14.
JACC Case Rep ; 4(21): 1429-1431, 2022 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36388719

RESUMEN

Peripheral migration of a venous stent to the heart is a rare but known complication, with the heart being the most common site of landing. Echocardiographic modalities are essential in clinical diagnosis and management, particularly with limited data and consensus regarding the best management approach. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

18.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 39: 100975, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35242998

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) can be used to assist stent deployment in severe coronary artery calcifications (CAC). METHODS: Studies employing IVL for CAC lesions were included. The primary outcomes included clinical and angiographic success. The secondary outcomes, including lumen gain, maximum calcium thickness, and calcium angle at the final angiography site, minimal lumen area site, and minimal stent area site, were analyzed by the random-effects model to calculate the pooled standardized mean difference. Tertiary outcomes included safety event ratios. RESULTS: Seven studies (760 patients) were included. The primary outcomes: pooled clinical and angiographic success event ratio parentage of IVL was 94.4% and 94.8%, respectively. On a random effect model for standard inverse variance for secondary outcomes showed: minimal lumen diameter increase with IVL was 4.68 mm (p-value < 0.0001, 95% CI 1.69-5.32); diameter decrease in the stenotic area after IVL session was -5.23 mm (95 CI -22.6-12.8). At the minimal lumen area (MLA) and final minimal stent area (MSA) sites, mean lumen area gain was 1.42 mm2 (95% CI 1.06-1.63; p < 0.00001) and 1.34 mm2 (95% CI 0.71-1.43; p < 0.00001), respectively. IVL reduced calcium thickness at the MLA site (SMD -0.22; 95% CI -0.40-0.04; P = 0.02); calcium angle was not affected at the MLA site. The tertiary outcomes: most common complication was major adverse cardiovascular events (n = 48/669), and least common complication was abrupt closure of the vessel (n = 1/669). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that IVL safely and effectively facilitates stent deployment with high angiographic and clinical success rates in treating severely calcified coronary lesions.

20.
BJR Case Rep ; 8(1): 20210069, 2022 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35136633

RESUMEN

Ventricular septal defect is a common congenital cardiac condition that presents in a variety of morphologies. Less commonly, when an individual patient is found to have multiple ventricular septal defects, the term "Swiss cheese ventricular septal defect" is applied. Although not routinely utilized in clinical practice, electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has been shown to provide utility in detecting intracardiac shunts, demonstrating promise in preventing acute strokes secondary to a paradoxical embolus from occurring; this is especially important when atypical cardiac septa are suspected. This case seeks to illustrate how usage of ECG-gated CTA can assist in early detection and prevention of adverse outcomes resulting from an atypical presentation of a ventricular septal defect.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...